State v. Piatt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding where evidence established that venue would be proper in defendant’s county of residence
• reversing and remanding where the record unambiguously established that the defendant resided in the county in which he was tried, making venue proper under ORS 131.325

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lusareta
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-03-25· cited 2×
• State v. Schindler
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-09-14· cited 1×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mills
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2013-10-17· cited 48×
• State v. Weilert
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-05· cited 10×
• State v. Parsons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-11-14· cited 6×
• State v. Sharp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-03-05· cited 2×
• State v. Sharp
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-04-16· cited 1×