State v. Phippen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that where jurat was not completed and record was barren of other proof of administration of oath, complainant was not shown to be under oath and complaint was therefore deficient
• construing a verified complaint as one that bears a statement under oath
• uniform traffic citation and complaint form containing incomplete jurat insufficient to constitute an oath or affirmation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Walker
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1998-02-16· cited 50×
• Knix v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1996-08-02· cited 20×
• State v. Carter
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2000-10-11· cited 15×
• State of Iowa v. Maurice D. Angel and Kemia B. McDowell
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2017-04-21· cited 10×
• Iowa Supreme Court Commission on the Unauthorized Practice of Law v. Raymond William Sullins
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2017-04-07· cited 8×
• City of Cedar Rapids v. Atsinger
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2000-09-07· cited 5×
• Amended July 5, 2017 State of Iowa v. Maurice D. Angel and Kemia B. McDowell
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2017-04-21
• Amended July 10, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Commission on the Unauthorized Practice of Law v. Raymond William Sullins
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2017-04-07

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miller v. Palo Alto Board of Supervisors
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1957-06-26· cited 24×
• State v. Abrams
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1906-09-25· cited 19×
• State v. Buehler
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1963-12-18· cited 14×
• State v. Reilly
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1899-04-05· cited 13×
• State v. Bostwick
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1953-03-10· cited 9×
• Breeden v. Nielsen
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1964-04-08· cited 6×