Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 10/24/1985
State v. Philbrick
Citations
- 127 N.H. 353
- 499 A.2d 1341
- 1985 N.H. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that to ignore the pretrial incarceration of the indigent offender is to permit discrimination based on economic status which is \unwise and unjust\ (quotation omitted)
- holding second time offender could be sentenced to mandatory seven consecutive day sentence and still be entitled to credit under mandatory credit rule, thereby reducing sentence to three consecutive day term
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Batchelder, Johnson, Others
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. DeckerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-12-05· cited 16×
- State v. CalvertNew Mexico Court of Appeals· 2002-12-13· cited 3×
- In re New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission Statewide Electric Utility Restructuring PlanSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-12-23· cited 2×
- State v. Daniel AllainSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2018-09-11
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Swiezynski v. CivielloSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-02-21· cited 31×
- State v. RileySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-03-20· cited 24×
- People v. SylvestryCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1980-10-09· cited 19×
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 1971-06-02· cited 14×
- Cagan's, Inc. v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1985-03-18· cited 14×
- Lingo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-04-13· cited 6×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-06-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.