State v. Pettit

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing, in reliance on Rankin, that the privacy clause of the Washington Constitution “prohibits law enforcement officials from requesting identification from passengers for investigative purposes unless there is an independent basis that justifies that request”
• asking a question unrelated to the justification for traffic stop \was brief and did not significantly extend the duration beyond that of a typical traffic stop\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State Of Washington v. Carmen Rose Lee
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2019-02-25· cited 3×
• James Henry Perozzo v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2021-07-09· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. Johnson
  Supreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 1,709×
• State v. Rankin
  Washington Supreme Court· 2004-06-10· cited 161×
• State v. Sadler
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-10-14· cited 48×
• State v. Raines
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1989-09-18· cited 40×
• State v. Bliss
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-11-17· cited 37×
• State v. Allen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2007-05-08· cited 19×
• State v. Shuffelen
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-04-13· cited 13×
• State v. SHUFFELEN
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-06-08· cited 12×
• State v. Pettit
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2011-01-11· cited 3×