· 7/11/2007
State v. Petri
Citations
- 162 P.3d 1053
- 214 Or. App. 138
- 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 967
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that opening a sunglasses case was not justified, because the contents of the case posed no threat where the officer already had taken the case from the handcuffed defendant’s pocket
- once sunglasses case containing a needle was seized from defendant, “no officer safety concern would have justified opening the case”
- officer lacked objective probable cause to arrest defendant who was riding away from a known drug house and carrying a sunglasses case that he said contained a needle
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.