Skip to main content
· 7/11/2007

State v. Petri

Citations

  • 162 P.3d 1053
  • 214 Or. App. 138
  • 2007 Ore. App. LEXIS 967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that opening a sunglasses case was not justified, because the contents of the case posed no threat where the officer already had taken the case from the handcuffed defendant’s pocket
  • once sunglasses case containing a needle was seized from defendant, “no officer safety concern would have justified opening the case”
  • officer lacked objective probable cause to arrest defendant who was riding away from a known drug house and carrying a sunglasses case that he said contained a needle

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Schuman, Ortega

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.