Wisconsin Supreme Court· 12/1/1981
State v. Peterson
Citations
- 312 N.W.2d 784
- 104 Wis. 2d 616
- 1981 Wisc. LEXIS 3058
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that civil rules of pleading, not criminal rales, apply to traffic offenses punishable by civil forfeiture
- holding that a circuit court may amend pleadings on its own motion
- holding that a circuit court may amend pleadings on its own motion
- “[T]he legislature intended that violations of state traffic laws involving forfeitures be treated as civil offenses .... ”
- stating the same with regard to the federal rule
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Shirley S. Abrahamson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Rosenthal v. National Produce Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-04-18· cited 80×
- State v. Patrick H. DaltonWisconsin Supreme Court· 2018-07-03· cited 66×
- County of Racine v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1984-12-12· cited 42×
- State v. KramsvogelWisconsin Supreme Court· 1985-05-29· cited 33×
- State v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-04-27· cited 31×
- American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees Local 1901 v. Brown CountyWisconsin Supreme Court· 1988-12-14· cited 23×
- Larry v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court· 2008-07-09· cited 21×
- C.L. v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1987-05-21· cited 15×
- Schultz v. TrascherCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2001-10-02· cited 14×
- Harmann v. SchulkeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1988-10-26· cited 13×
- County of Walworth v. RohnerWisconsin Supreme Court· 1982-10-05· cited 10×
- United States v. Bradley J. DevenportSeventh Circuit· 1997-10-30· cited 9×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1994-09-20· cited 9×
- Smith v. LongCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1993-08-17· cited 8×
- State v. NaydihorCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1992-03-11· cited 3×
- Opinion No. Oag 61-88, (1988)Wisconsin Attorney General Reports· 1988-10-14· cited 1×
- Oconomowoc Area School District v. Gregory L. CotaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2024-01-10· cited 1×
- Opinion No. Oag 41-82, (1982)Wisconsin Attorney General Reports· 1982-06-23
- Larkin v. JohnstonMassachusetts Superior Court· 2015-10-15
- Lowell Management Services, Inc. v. Matthew D Ruecker and Dawn M Ruecker Revocable TrustCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2026-03-25
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Gerard M. Monod and Alys Monod v. Futura, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Highlands, Inc., a Colorado Corporation, and Whipple Van Ness JonesTenth Circuit· 1969-09-26· cited 82×
- Vargas v. McNamaraFirst Circuit· 1979-10-30· cited 63×
- James C. Ellis and Wanda Lou Ellis, His Wife v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas CompanyTenth Circuit· 1979-11-13· cited 59×
- International Harvester Credit Corp. v. East Coast TruckFifth Circuit· 1977-02-25· cited 56×
- George Eric Rosden v. A. LeutholdD.C. Circuit· 1960-01-19· cited 52×
- State v. DudaWisconsin Supreme Court· 1973-10-02· cited 25×
- City of Neenah v. KruegerWisconsin Supreme Court· 1932-01-12· cited 22×
- Cox v. Fremont County Public Building AuthorityTenth Circuit· 1969-09-03· cited 21×
- Wiegel v. Sentry Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1980-02-07· cited 20×
- City of Milwaukee v. WukyWisconsin Supreme Court· 1965-03-02· cited 17×
- McLeod v. StevensFourth Circuit· 1980-02-29· cited 15×
- In re GrunwellCustoms and Patent Appeals· 1979-11-15· cited 4×
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1981-04-07· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.