Skip to main content

State v. Peters

Citations

  • 855 S.W.2d 345
  • 1993 WL 173110

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming trial court’s adoption of this course and finding no violation of defendant’s rights under the Double Jeopardy Clause
  • when a jury returns a verdict in improper form, it is the duty of the trial court to refuse to accept the same
  • “[I]f the defendant was not guilty of assault, he cannot be guilty of armed criminal action based on assault.”
  • verdicts inconsistent “because if the defendant was not guilty of assault, he cannot be guilty of armed criminal action based on assault”; trial court properly refused verdicts and ordered jury to deliberate further to resolve inconsistency

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas, Holstein, Benton, Price, Limbaugh, Robertson, Covington

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.