State v. Peters

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that a factfinder may infer that a defendant intended the natural and probable consequences of his act
• intentions are determined by “outward manifestations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chapman v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-11-01· cited 61×
• State v. Basting
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1997-12-18· cited 52×
• State v. Bogenreif
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1991-01-30· cited 34×
• People v. Wells
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-01-14· cited 31×
• State v. Born
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-05-24· cited 30×
• State v. Spencer
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-03-08· cited 21×
• State v. Janisch
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1980-03-26· cited 21×
• State v. Hemmings
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1985-07-09· cited 10×
• State v. Granroth
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1972-07-28· cited 7×
• State v. Stevenson
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2002-01-08· cited 5×
• United States v. Fitzgerald
  N.D. California· 1987-09-24· cited 5×
• State v. Barner
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1993-12-27· cited 5×
• Gilles v. State
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-04-12· cited 3×
• State v. Hayes
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1967-04-28· cited 3×
• McConnell v. City of Mankato
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1990-05-22· cited 1×
• United States v. Spearman
  United States Court of Military Appeals· 1974-04-12· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Alm
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1961-11-03· cited 16×
• State v. Roggenbuck
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1965-07-16· cited 9×
• State Ex Rel. Cobb v. Rigg
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1957-12-27· cited 6×