State v. Perryman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing McNeely and noting that the Court reaffirmed in that case “that a determination of whether a warrantless, nonconsensual blood draw is constitutional depends upon the totality of the circumstances in each case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People of Michigan v. Glorianna Woodard
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 2017-09-19· cited 48×
• State v. Jessica M. Randall
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2019-07-02· cited 11×
• State v. Portulano
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-06-15· cited 10×
• State v. Kelly
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-15· cited 4×
• State v. Oxford
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-04-28· cited 2×
• State v. Stephens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-05-19

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schmerber v. California
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
• Ball v. Gladden
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1968-07-17· cited 849×
• Sterling v. Cupp
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1981-03-04· cited 206×
• State v. Bridewell
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-26· cited 131×
• State v. Holdorf
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-07· cited 75×
• State v. Baker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-09-01· cited 69×
• State v. Milligan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-01-06· cited 67×
• State v. MacHuca
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 65×
• State v. Meharry
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2006-12-21· cited 47×
• State v. Sullivan
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-08-20· cited 11×
• State v. Martinez-Alvarez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 7×
• State v. Raymond
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-21· cited 4×
• State v. Sjogren
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-10-28· cited 4×