State v. Perez-Rodriguez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that where mailed motion for BVA reconsideration was addressed to BVA but lacked VA “mail stop” code in address, claimant had substantially complied with 38 C.F.R. § 20.1001(b) mailing requirements and with BVA Notice
• determining that claimant had demonstrated substantial compliance with regulation directing where to send Notice of Appeal despite use of incorrect address

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).