Skip to main content
· 3/22/1995

State v. Penrod

Citations

  • 892 P.2d 729
  • 133 Or. App. 454
  • 1995 Ore. App. LEXIS 511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying that standard to an officer’s intrusion into attorney-client communications

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Deits, P.J., and Riggs and Haselton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.