Ohio Supreme Court· 8/16/1995

State v. Peeples

Citations

1995 Ohio 36
73 Ohio St. 3d 149

Syllabus

Appellate procedure—Successive applications for reopening appeal from judgment and conviction based on claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel—Application denied—App.R. 26(B) makes no provision for filing successive applications to reopen.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Miller v. Mellot
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-01-24· cited 2×
State v. Townsend
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-04-19· cited 1×
State v. Mays
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-17
U.S. Bank v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2023-12-11

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

State v. Reddick
Ohio Supreme Court· 1995-04-26· cited 212×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.