Skip to main content

State v. Peck

Citations

  • 946 P.2d 1351
  • 130 Idaho 711
  • 1997 Ida. App. LEXIS 117

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that after the defendant’s pro se motion to dismiss counsel, the court should have conducted an inquiry into the reasons for the defendant’s dissatisfaction
  • noting that even well-founded suspicions of intentional delay and manipulative tactics can provide no substitute for the inquiries necessary to protect a defendant’s constitutional rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lansing, Perry, Walters

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.