State v. Pearson

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 520

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences it made all the required consecutive sentence findings at the sentencing hearing and in the sentencing entry, and the findings were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. Also, appellant's claim that the charging indictment was defective because it did not include all elements of the offense of failure to appear as required by recognizance does not warrant a reversal of appellant's conviction, as appellant failed to object to the indictment in the trial court and failed to establish plain error. Judgment affirmed.