State v. Pearson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refusing to consider affidavit in support of claim “being of the view that they are not properly raised in this Court”
• under common law of evidence, juror affidavits could be considered to show “misconduct of a party or a court officer” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. McMurtrey
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-03-01· cited 95×
• Joe Leonard Lambright v. Terry Stewart, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-03-06· cited 56×
• State v. Ballesteros
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1966-04-29· cited 46×
• State v. Clemons
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1974-04-25· cited 45×
• Kirby v. Rosell
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1982-05-11· cited 29×
• State v. Cookus
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1977-04-25· cited 26×
• State v. Moraga
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-06-17· cited 19×
• State v. Callahan
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-03-28· cited 16×
• State v. Urias
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1968-10-23· cited 15×
• State v. Kidwell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-10-08· cited 14×
• State v. Lindsay
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1967-06-13· cited 11×
• Valley National Bank of Arizona v. Haney
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-11-04· cited 11×
• State v. Landrum
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1975-12-23· cited 9×
• State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Riddel
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1991-09-05· cited 7×
• American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-08-05· cited 3×
• State v. Compton
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1980-11-04· cited 2×