State v. Peacock
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4021
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction of sexual battery was not against the manifest weight of evidence because the record contains ample evidence of the victim's substantial impairment, including appellant's own statements. The prosecutor did not engage in misconduct by referring to COVID-19 delays during closing argument, as this information was common knowledge and inconsequential to the outcome of appellant's trial.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1984-11-07· cited 1,321×
- State v. LeonardOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 674×
- State v. KeenanOhio Supreme Court· 1993-06-16· cited 535×
- State v. BallewOhio Supreme Court· 1996-08-07· cited 386×
- State v. ZehOhio Supreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 128×
- State v. BolesOhio Court of Appeals· 2010-11-12· cited 13×
- State v. FreemanOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-06-02· cited 10×
- State v. FranklinOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-04-24· cited 7×
- State v. HarrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-09· cited 6×
- State v. SchwambergerOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-10-24· cited 3×
- State v. JarvisOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-07· cited 2×
- State v. HolseyOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-08· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.