State v. Pau'u

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a search was invalid where the defendant “felt the futility of withholding any consent or confession”
• holding that arguments regarding the sufficient attenuation to dissipate the taint of a prior illegality must be supported by evidence
• holding that a search was invalid where the defendant “felt the futility of withholding any consent or confession”
• holding that evidence obtained in violation of the federal and state constitutional prohibitions against unreasonable search and seizure may not be used to secure a defendant’s conviction
• holding that the government’s burden to show that a confession is voluntary is particularly heavy when the defendant is under arrest and that the waiver is invalid if it is induced by a prior illegality
• holding that the government's burden to show that a confession is voluntary is particularly heavy when the defendant is under arrest and that the waiver is invalid if it is induced by a prior illegality

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).