State v. Paulo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• it is Board’s function, and not that of Court, to determine credibility and authenticity of documents in question
• Court held that claimant’s evidence in resubmitted claim to revoke forfeiture under 38 U.S.C. § 6104 was not new
• it is the Board’s function, and not that of the Court, to determine the credibility and authenticity of documents in question
• same for claim to reopen revocation of forfeiture under 38 U.S.C. § 6104(a)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).