Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2/1/1994
State v. Patterson
Citations
- 511 N.W.2d 476
- 1994 Minn. App. LEXIS 95
- 1994 WL 24106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that victim’s need for “future counseling for her psychological 8 injury” was one of multiple “substantial and compelling” factors to support double- durational departure
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Forsberg, Klaphake
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. SchantzenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1981-07-15· cited 82×
- State v. Van GordenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-11-24· cited 63×
- State v. BestSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-12-22· cited 55×
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1982-10-01· cited 53×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1984-10-23· cited 21×
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-03-03· cited 12×
- State v. StauffacherCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1986-01-28· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.