Skip to main content

State v. Patterson

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1768

Syllabus

Defective indictment; dangerous ordnance; switch; machine gun conversion device; sufficiency; manifest weight; knowingly; possession. Appellant's conviction for possessing a dangerous ordnance upheld because the direct and circumstantial evidence established that appellant knowingly possessed a firearm modified with a switch or machine gun conversion device, thus rendering the firearm a dangerous ordnance. Indictment was not defective because it tracked the language of the statute and appellant did not establish that he did not have notice of the offense.

Judges: Keough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.