State v. Patricelli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “It would be different if defendant’s sentences were consecutive because in that case crediting the defendant for jail time against both sentences would give him an unfair double credit.”
• decided October 26, 1984 and noting for first time that in addition to the \in connection with\ test, consideration should also be given to fact that defendant's sentences were concurrent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).