Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 12/11/1991
State v. Patch
Citations
- 135 N.H. 127
- 599 A.2d 1243
- 1991 N.H. LEXIS 155
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that sexual assault indictment alleging several acts of assault was duplicitous because it was impossible to know whether jurors all convicted defendant on same act
- error to consolidate a number of separate felonious sexual assault offenses in one count of an indictment under a general plea of a course of conduct involving several incidents of intentional touching
- defendant sufficiently asserted constitutional duplicitous argument without using specific term “duplicitous”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thayer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BlankenburgOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-03-26· cited 99×
- Cooksey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2000-06-02· cited 38×
- State v. FortierSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-09-25· cited 38×
- State v. PaulsenSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-03-18· cited 20×
- State v. WoodardSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2001-04-04· cited 20×
- State v. DupontSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2003-01-24· cited 19×
- State v. MartiSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1999-06-21· cited 18×
- State v. HaleySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1997-01-23· cited 10×
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1994-07-11· cited 6×
- State v. BowlingOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-02-02· cited 5×
- Krueger v. CoplanD. New Hampshire· 2002-12-17· cited 1×
- Dupont v. CoplanFirst Circuit· 2004-07-09
- Krueger v. WardenD. New Hampshire· 2002-12-17
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.