State v. Pascual

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an “election between inconsistent defenses was a legitimate exercise of trial strategy rather than ineffective assistance of counsel”
• stating that “any election between inconsistent defenses was a legitimate exercise of trial strategy rather than ineffective assistance of counsel”
• “We believe any election between inconsistent defenses was a legitimate exercise of trial strategy rather than ineffective assistance of counsel.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).