Skip to main content

State v. Partee

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 3878

Syllabus

The trial court did not deny Partee the ability to cross-examine the witnesses, the trial court did not err in its evidentiary rulings, the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction to hear the case, Partee did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel, and sufficient evidence supports Partee's conviction for obstructing official business.

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.