State v. Partain

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the substance of what defendant would have said can be inferred from his counsel’s question, no express offer of proof was necessary to preserve the error for appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Maxon
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-22· cited 2×
• State v. Taylor
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2025-05-08· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• State v. Affeld
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-11-16· cited 78×
• State v. Evans
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1920-10-19· cited 50×
• State v. Maiden
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-08-20· cited 45×
• State v. Henley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2018-07-19· cited 43×
• State v. Sanchez-Jacobo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-06-27· cited 12×
• State v. Wirfs
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-31· cited 10×
• State v. Abbott
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-12· cited 5×
• State v. SIERRA-DEPINA
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-05· cited 3×
• State v. SIERRA-DEPINA
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-10-21· cited 2×
• State v. James
  Multnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-07-27· cited 2×