State v. Parsons
Citations
- 250 N.E.3d 888
- 2024 Ohio 3367
Syllabus
Crim.R. 33(B) Motion for Leave to File a Motion for a New Trial. The trial court did not apply the proper legal standard and procedure in deciding appellant-defendant's motion for leave to file an untimely motion for a new trial based on alleged newly discovered evidence, as set forth in Criminal Rule 33. The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the case is remanded for the trial court to consider anew the motion for leave under the proper standard.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- State v. HattonOhio Supreme Court· 2022-11-10· cited 113×
- State v. McNealOhio Supreme Court· 2022-08-09· cited 66×
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-21· cited 60×
- In re Adoption of P.L.H. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-07-18· cited 27×
- State v. FrancisOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-01· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.