State v. Parshall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [ALJ] erred when formulating Martin’s 4 [RFC] because the RFC neither incorporated Dr. Steiner’s opinion of Martin’s 5 work limitations nor gave specific and legitimate reasons for rejecting it.”
• “The administrative law judge (ALJ) erred when formulating Martin’s 4 residual functional capacity (RFC) because the RFC neither incorporated Dr. Steiner’s opinion of 5 Martin’s work limitations nor gave specific and legitimate reasons for rejecting it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).