Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/9/2023

State v. Parker

Citations

2023 Ohio 802

Syllabus

Application for reopening App.R. 26(B) successive applications motion for leave to file successive application res judicata. A motion for leave to file a successive application for reopening was denied because there is no provision in App.R. 26(B) for successive applications and res judicata bars relitigation of claims of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel for claims not raised in the prior application for reopening.

Judges: Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Leyh (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-02-08· cited 76×
State v. Richardson
Ohio Supreme Court· 1996-01-10· cited 32×
State v. Twyford
Ohio Supreme Court· 2005-09-07· cited 28×
State v. Williams
Ohio Supreme Court· 2003-06-17· cited 22×
State v. Parker
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-01· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.