State v. Parker

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• no disqualifying rehabilitation program where the defendant was “referred” to, but did not participate in, a treatment program
• “[E]ven if a defendant has established eli- gibility for diversion under ORS 813.215, the court must then determine whether to allow diversion by reference to a variety of considerations” under ORS 813.220.
• “[E]ven if a defendant has established eli- gibility for diversion under ORS 813.215, the court must then determine whether to allow diversion by reference to a variety of considerations” under ORS 813.220.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. LAGRASSA
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-04-28· cited 3×
• State v. Chapman (A183086)
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-11-19· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & Industries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-10-19· cited 2,400×
• State v. Gaines
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-04-30· cited 1,741×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-29· cited 14×
• State v. Wright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-03-22· cited 13×
• State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. San Seng Saechao
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2000-05-10· cited 11×
• State v. Warrington
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-05-07· cited 8×
• State v. Dunbrasky
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-07-28· cited 6×