Skip to main content

State v. Parker

Citations

  • 545 A.2d 512
  • 149 Vt. 393
  • 1988 Vt. LEXIS 33

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that continued protestations of innocence do not, per se, prevent court from finding guilty plea is voluntarily made
  • noting that “a determination that the evidence in question will ‘prejudice’ the defendant is not necessarily sufficient” to justify exclusion
  • explaining that where court has discretion to make ruling, error not shown simply because different judge faced with same evidence might reach different conclusion
  • recognizing that trial court has wide discretion in ruling on admissibility of evidence, and its rulings will not be set aside unless defendant shows that such “discretion was either totally withheld or exercised on grounds clearly untenable or unreason able” (quotation omitted)
  • describing strong policy against appellate court substituting its judgment for that of trial court regarding the admission of evidence under Rules 404(b) and 403
  • describing strong policy against appellate court substituting its judgment for that of trial court regarding admission of evidence under Rule 403

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, C.J., and Hill, Peck, Gibson and Hayes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.