State v. Parker
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 85
Syllabus
REOPENING – App.R. 26(B); untimely pro se application to reopen direct appeal; Appellant fails to establish good cause for the delay; even assuming that Appellant had complied with the requirements of App.R. 26(B)(1) and (2)(b), he fails to meet the standard for reopening this appeal pursuant to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984); Appellant fails to establish that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel on appeal; application denied.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. SpiveyOhio Supreme Court· 1998-11-25· cited 313×
- State v. GummOhio Supreme Court· 2004-09-22· cited 197×
- State v. WinsteadOhio Supreme Court· 1996-01-10· cited 106×
- State v. DewOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-31· cited 20×
- State v. FarrowOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 11×
- State v. FrazierOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-09· cited 7×
- State v. ParkerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-16· cited 6×
- State v. CutlipOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-03-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.