Skip to main content

State v. Parham

Citations

  • 220 N.W.2d 623
  • 1974 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that if testimony could incriminate the witness for other crimes, he may properly assert the privilege
  • reviewing for an abuse of discretion the district court’s decision to compel a witness’s answers against his assertion of the privilege against self-incrimination
  • considering a conviction for aggravated robbery and stating that one of its “essential elements” is that the “taking was with force or violence or that such taking was by putting [the victim] in fear” (alteration added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Mason, Rees, Reynoldson, Mc-Cormick

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.