State v. Parham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that remand for resentencing “obviates the need to address [the] defendant’s remaining claims of sentencing errors because the issues they concern may not arise on remand”
• explaining that remand for resentenc- ing “obviates the need to address [the] defendant’s remain- ing claims of sentencing errors because the issues they con- cern may not arise on remand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Fasasi
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2024-07-10· cited 3×
• State v. Martinez-Mateo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-02-05· cited 1×
• State v. Kiemtore
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-11-17

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Ramos
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-30· cited 10×
• State v. Martinez-Mateo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-02-05· cited 1×