State v. Pancake

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding defendant’s convictions for both burglary and rape arising from the same criminal transaction
• “[defendant would have been entitled to a cautionary instruction, but did not ask for one”
• “[defendant would have been entitled to a cautionary instruction, but did not ask for one”
• \[r]ape is not a lesser-included offense of burglary\ under the Blockburger test
• “[r]ape is not a lesser-included offense of burglary” under the Blockburger test
• “A trial judge’s ruling after an in camera hearing on admissibility of evidence of a rape victim’s prior sexual relationship with defendant will not be disturbed on appeal unless there is a clear abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).