State v. Pamelia
Citations
- 122 La. 207
- 47 So. 508
- 1908 La. LEXIS 432
Syllabus
<p>1. CRIMINAL Law (| 1156*) — Appeal—Refusal of New Trial.</p> <p>When the trial judge in a criminal case refuses an application for a new trial which is based upon testimony alleged to be newly discovered evidence, his refusal cannot be set aside on appeal when the object of that testimony is to weaken or destroy that taken on the trial, of which the trial court has knowledge and the Supreme Court has not.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — Eor other cases, see Criminal Law, Cent. Dig. § 3069; Dec. Dig. § 1156.*]</p> <p>2. Criminal Law (§ 519*) — Confessions—Admissibility.</p> <p>Statements of a person as to his connection with a crime, made when he is taken under arrest to the police station charged with that crime, are admissible against him in evidence, though made under great excitement and nervousness, if voluntarily made.</p> <p>[Ed. 'Note. — for other cases, see Criminal Law. Cent. Dig. § 1167; Dec. Dig. § 519.*].</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “a failure-to-screen claim typically requires [the plaintiff to allege] the same two elements as a failure-to- train claim: deliberate indifference and causation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nicholls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.