State v. Palozie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the state was permitted to question the defendant concerning his use of a \strap\ on his children during a time period not within the information because it was relevant on the issue of the credibility of the defendant
• strapping to a degree that bruises and some scabbing covered a three-inch area of the child’s buttocks was sufficient to warrant defendant’s conviction, under a penal statute, of the crime of risk of injury to a child
• slap in the face and poke in the nose constitute assaults
• slap in the face and poke in the nose constitute assaults
• child strapped, thrown against chair, hitting its head against floor
• child strapped, thrown against chair and head hit against floor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).