State v. Palmer
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1554
Syllabus
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW/CRIMINAL — DUE PROCESS —MATERIALLY EXCULPATORY: The trial court erred by dismissing on due-process grounds a complaint charging domestic violence, because defendant's due-process rights were not violated when the state, without bad faith, failed to preserve a video interview of the prosecuting witness that was not materially exculpatory as it would not have contributed in any appreciable way to defendant's defense.
Judges: Winkler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court· 2012-06-13· cited 423×
- State v. GeeslinOhio Supreme Court· 2007-10-11· cited 89×
- State v. BentonOhio Court of Appeals· 2000-03-17· cited 79×
- State v. BeaversOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-31· cited 6×
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-05-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.