Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/17/1991
State v. Palmer
Citations
- 810 P.2d 734
- 248 Kan. 681
- 1991 Kan. LEXIS 86
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that to constitute concealment of fact of the crime of theft sufficient to toll statute of limitations, there must be positive act calculated to prevent discovery of theft by those owning or having possession of property prior to theft
- “The crime of theft ... [by obtaining unauthorized control over property] is not a continuing offense.”
- the purpose of the CFA is to “prevent unscrupulous persons and organizations from contributing unlimited sums of money in order to obtain improper influence over candidates for elective office or to affect the outcome of elections”
- theft not a continuing offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KunellisSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-10-31· cited 70×
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-12-08· cited 57×
- State v. ButlerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1995-06-13· cited 49×
- Nichols v. Kansas Political Action CommitteeSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-10-27· cited 34×
- United States v. Bardon Blizzard, Jr., A/K/A Buzz BlizzardFourth Circuit· 1994-06-20· cited 26×
- State v. VondalNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-09-15· cited 23×
- State v. HipplerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-03-20· cited 20×
- State v. MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-05-27· cited 18×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1997-10-31· cited 17×
- Kifer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-12-20· cited 17×
- State v. DonhamCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-05-11· cited 14×
- State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1999-05-28· cited 13×
- State v. Valdiviezo-MartinezSupreme Court of Kansas· 2021-05-21· cited 13×
- State v. BeltSupreme Court of Kansas· 2008-03-28· cited 10×
- State v. ArehartCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-07-29· cited 8×
- State v. MullinMontana Supreme Court· 1994-12-06· cited 7×
- Brandvold v. Lewis and Clark Public School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-09-15· cited 3×
- Nichols v. Kansas Governmental Ethics CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-01-26· cited 2×
- John O. Study v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2015-02-04
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 1994-06-21
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Grunewald v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-05-27· cited 1,102×
- State v. DoyenSupreme Court of Kansas· 1978-07-15· cited 35×
- State v. GainerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1980-04-05· cited 32×
- State v. PuckettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-12-05· cited 25×
- State v. KeeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-12-06· cited 25×
- State v. BentleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1986-06-13· cited 21×
- State v. KliewerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1972-12-09· cited 19×
- State v. GrauerholzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1982-12-03· cited 15×
- State v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas· 1985-10-25· cited 12×
- State v. VakasSupreme Court of Kansas· 1987-10-30· cited 11×
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1937-05-08· cited 11×
- State v. WingettSupreme Court of Kansas· 1932-12-10· cited 9×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Kansas· 1934-12-08· cited 8×
- State v. HeinzSupreme Court of Kansas· 1926-07-10· cited 6×
- State v. ReinekingCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1985-09-26· cited 4×
- State v. McGinleySupreme Court of Kansas· 1930-02-08· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.