Court of Appeals of Oregon· 7/5/1978
State v. Palmer
Citations
- 580 P.2d 592
- 35 Or. App. 125
- 1978 Ore. App. LEXIS 2713
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A defendant appearing pro se must inform himself of and comply with court rules as any other litigant.”
- “A defendant appearing pro se must inform himself of and comply with court rules as any other litigant.”
- “A defendant appearing pro se must inform himself of and comply with court rules as any other litigant.”
- “A defendant appearing pro se must inform [themself] of and comply with court rules 150 State v. Kirk as any other litigant.”
- “A defendant appearing pro se must inform himself of and comply with court rules as any other litigant.”
- “A defendant appearing pro se must inform himself of and comply with court rules as any other litigant.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schwab, Johnson, Gillette, Roberts
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. BebbWashington Supreme Court· 1987-07-23· cited 77×
- Lizarríbar v. Martínez GelpíSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1988-06-30· cited 39×
- Wahlgren v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2004-12-08· cited 13×
- Union Lumber Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-06-18· cited 3×
- State v. BivensCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-07-05
- Six v. BilyeuCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-01-26
- State v. ThreeEaglesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-04-22
- Boersma v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-05-06
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.