State v. Palacol

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that medical evidence that is speculative, general, or inconclusive cannot be used to support a claim
• clarifying that phrases such as \possible\ are too speculative in nature to establish a link
• noting that a medical opinion expressed in terms of \may\ also implies \may or may not\ and is too speculative to establish medical nexus
• holding speculative or inclusive medical opinions are not probative
• medical opinion expressed in terms of \may\ also implies \may or may not\ and is too speculative to establish medical nexus
• medical opinion expressed in terms of “may” also implies “may or may not” and is too speculative to establish medical nexus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).