State v. Painter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidentiary error required reversal where improperly admitted evidence was “presented to the jury as bearing directly on the central issues in the case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-30· cited 2×
• State v. Abraham
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-04· cited 1×
• State v. McCrary
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-10-22

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• Peeples v. Lampert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
• State v. Perkins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-09· cited 22×
• State v. Klamert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1969-06-11· cited 16×