Skip to main content
· 8/30/2017

State v. Oxford

Citations

  • 287 Or. App. 580
  • 403 P.3d 528
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 1019

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing exception to general rule of one substantial-justification determination when, inter alia, the “action involves distinct and sev-erable claims”
  • fees excluda-ble from EAJA award are those (1) for time spent on distinct and severable claims, and (2) for, expenses that would have been necessary even if the United States had not taken an unjustified position on the merits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dehoog, Hadlock, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.