State v. Owens
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2415
Syllabus
Maximum sentence consecutive sentences R.C. 2929.11 R.C. 2929.12 sexual battery attempted escape contrary to law R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) nunc pro tunc entry. - Maximum sentences imposed for defendant's offenses of sexual battery and attempted escape were not contrary to law where the sentences were within the statutory range for the offenses and the trial court considered R.C. 2929.11 and 2929.12 when imposing the sentences trial court made the necessary findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) to impose consecutive sentences but the matter was remanded for the trial court to issue nunc pro tunc sentencing entries because the trial court failed to incorporate its consecutive-sentence findings into its sentencing entries.
Judges: Keough
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-01-16· cited 70×
- State v. SuttonOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-01· cited 57×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County· 2018-03-15· cited 57×
- State v, WatkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.