State v. Owens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Taking a common sense view of the matter, we are simply not persuaded that the legislature intended separate prosecutions and punishments for possession of PCP and possession of marihuana where the two substances have been, for all practical purposes, irrevocably joined as one.”
• “Taking a common sense view of the matter, we are simply not persuaded that the legislature intended separate prosecutions and punishments for possession of PCP and possession of marihuana where the two substances have been, for all practical purposes, irrevocably joined as one.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dickerson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1991-10-09· cited 76×
• Melton v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-12· cited 63×
• Dixon v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-05-14· cited 59×
• Spitzinger v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-10-04· cited 40×
• Satterfield v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-08· cited 5×
• Marshall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-10-01
• Jones v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-10-01
• Wallace v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-10-01
• Schriefer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-10-01
• Dana Mark Camann, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2024-01-16

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Albernaz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 1,588×
• United States v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1952-12-22· cited 657×
• Randall Book Corp. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-06-07· cited 106×
• State v. Jenkins
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-10-07· cited 101×
• Cunningham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1989-12-26· cited 84×