State v. Owens
Citations
- 235 Conn. App. 482
Syllabus
The defendant, who had been on probation in connection with his convic- tions, in two separate dockets, of violation of probation and interfering with an officer, appealed from the trial court's judgments revoking his probation and imposing a sentence of incarceration. He claimed, inter alia, that the court improperly denied his motion to dismiss, which alleged violations of his right to a speedy trial and of the 120 day guideline contained in the revocation of probation statute (§ 53a-32). Held: The trial court's denial of the defendant's motion to dismiss was not clearly erroneous, as § 53a-32 (c) does not extend the right to a speedy trial to probation revocation proceedings, and the court found that the commence- ment of the hearing was tolled in light of the defendant's voluminous motion practice and the numerous files pending before the court. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in waiting to rule on the defen- dant's request to represent himself, as the court reasonably waited to canvass the defendant for a period of approximately six weeks while a competency evaluation of the defendant was pending in another jurisdiction, and the delay in the court's canvass did not prejudice the defendant, who then represented himself at all critical stages of the proceedings. The trial court's finding that the defendant violated his probation was sup- ported by sufficient evidence, including testimony by the victim, which the court found to be highly credible. The defendant could not prevail on his claim that his due process rights were violated as a result of prosecutorial impropriety, specifically, that the prosecutor failed to correct certain statements by the victim during her testimony, which the defendant alleged were false or misleading, as this court's review of the victim's testimony revealed that the defendant had not demonstrated that the state presented any material, false or substantially misleading testimony that the prosecutor failed to correct, the
Judges: Cradle; Suarez; DiPentima
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court· 1993-06-24· cited 1,916×
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 495×
- Whisper Wind Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-08-17· cited 78×
- Whisper Wind Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-24· cited 77×
- United States v. JosephbergSecond Circuit· 2009-04-09· cited 71×
- State v. GradzikSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-04-24· cited 40×
- State v. AntrumSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1981-07-28· cited 38×
- United States v. BarnesSecond Circuit· 2012-09-04· cited 22×
- Greene v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-08-28· cited 15×
- State v. DudleySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-08-06· cited 10×
- State v. CushardSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-04-17· cited 9×
- State v. CampbellConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-12-12· cited 9×
- Ayuso v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-09-20· cited 9×
- State v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-11-25· cited 8×
- State v. BlakeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2008-06-10· cited 7×
- Wigenton v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2013-01-07· cited 6×
- Dushay v. Southern Connecticut Hockey League, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-08-26· cited 5×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 2017-12-19· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.