State v. Ott

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding former ORS 161.062 inapplicable to convictions for possession of controlled substances because the victim of a defendant’s act of possession was the state
• “[F]or purposes of ORS 161.062(4),[ 3 ] the term ‘victim’ does not encompass * * * the state.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Torres
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-05-02· cited 15×
• State v. Collins
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-01-31· cited 9×
• State v. Camarena-Velasco
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-07-19· cited 5×
• State v. Bell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-10-05· cited 4×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-09-13

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Donovan
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1989-03-07· cited 47×
• State v. Ness
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-11-16· cited 16×
• State v. Ness
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-11-02· cited 16×