Skip to main content

State v. Ott

Citations

  • 808 P.2d 305
  • 167 Ariz. 420
  • 71 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 37
  • 1990 Ariz. App. LEXIS 330

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the trial court had discretion in whether to grant a stay in a civil proceeding parallel to a criminal proceeding
  • “No federal or state constitutional rule prohibits parallel civil and criminal proceedings.”
  • advocating stay if parallel proceedings would substantially prejudice defendant’s rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGregor, Fidel, Lankford

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.