State v. Oscar R. Juracan-Juracan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the standard for evaluating a mandamus petition and a claim of unreasonable delay are the same
• explaining that, to obtain relief on an unreasonable delay claim, plaintiff must show that issuance of writ of mandamus would be justified
• explaining that, to obtain relief on an unreasonable delay claim, plaintiff must show that issuance of writ of mandamus would be justified
• noting that it was undisputed that the defendant had a duty to the plaintiff who had secured a remand order
• noting that the court had declined to issue the writ after the agency failed to respond to the court’s remand for 3 years, but issuing the writ when the delay reached 6 years
• explaining that the first TRAC factor is the “most important factor”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).