Supreme Court of Minnesota· 6/7/2007
State v. Osborne
Citations
- 732 N.W.2d 249
- 2007 Minn. LEXIS 305
- 2007 WL 1630249
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming probation revocation where the district court’s Austin analysis involved “a full review of [the defendant’s] lengthy history of criminal activity and chronic probation and treatment failures”
- appellant entitled to less judicial tolerance for a probation revocation of a level nine offense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Anderson, Barry, Hanson, Meyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.