Supreme Court of Iowa· 5/22/1985
State v. Osborn
Citations
- 368 N.W.2d 68
- 1985 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 1043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We start with the premise that changes made by revision of a statute will not be construed as altering the law unless the legislature’s intent to accomplish a change in its meaning is clear and unmistakable.”
- “We start with the premise that changes made by revision of a statute will not be construed as altering the law unless the legislature’s intent to 52 accomplish a change in its meaning is clear and unmistakable.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McCormick, Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State of Iowa v. John Robert HoymanSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-05-01· cited 55×
- State v. AhitowSupreme Court of Iowa· 1996-02-14· cited 48×
- Iowa Beta Chapter of Phi Delta Theta Fraternity v. State, University of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2009-02-20· cited 36×
- Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of the Iowa State Bar Ass'n v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa· 1987-07-22· cited 23×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 2009-07-10· cited 22×
- Iowa Farm Bureau Federation, Iowa Renewable Fuels Association, and Iowa Water Environment AssociationSupreme Court of Iowa· 2014-07-11· cited 21×
- Clark v. Iowa Dept. of Revenue and FinanceSupreme Court of Iowa· 2002-05-08· cited 14×
- State v. AzneerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1995-01-18· cited 13×
- State ex rel. Iowa Department of Transportation v. General Electric Credit Corp. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa· 1989-11-22· cited 13×
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa· 2016-11-10· cited 12×
- State v. TippettSupreme Court of Iowa· 2001-03-21· cited 9×
- State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa· 1992-09-23· cited 6×
- Iowa State Board of Engineering Examiners v. OlsonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1988-04-13· cited 4×
- State v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1988-04-13· cited 3×
- Mid-Iowa Community Action, Inc. v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa· 1988-04-13· cited 3×
- Yuska v. Iowa Department of Revenue (In re Yuska)N.D. Iowa· 2016-07-06· cited 1×
- State Ex Rel. Dot v. Gen. Elec. Cr. Corp.Supreme Court of Iowa· 1989-11-22
- State of Iowa v. Dennis BrouseCourt of Appeals of Iowa· 2016-12-21
- Amended January 30, 2017 Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Karen A. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa· 2016-11-10
- Amended July 13, 2015 State of Iowa v. John Robert HoymanSupreme Court of Iowa· 2015-05-01
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Spies v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1943-01-18· cited 1,702×
- United States v. PomponioSupreme Court· 1976-10-12· cited 509×
- United States v. BishopSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 417×
- State v. ConnerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1980-05-21· cited 60×
- United States v. Sant R. PallanNinth Circuit· 1978-03-06· cited 51×
- Eggman v. ScurrSupreme Court of Iowa· 1981-10-21· cited 50×
- State v. WallaceSupreme Court of Iowa· 1966-10-18· cited 48×
- State v. AldrichSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-07-31· cited 40×
- United States v. RifenEighth Circuit· 1978-06-07· cited 39×
- Emery v. FentonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1978-05-17· cited 35×
- Huston v. HustonSupreme Court of Iowa· 1963-07-16· cited 32×
- Veverka v. CashSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-04-21· cited 30×
- State v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-02-17· cited 28×
- Long v. BrewerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1977-05-25· cited 27×
- State v. BarneySupreme Court of Iowa· 1976-07-30· cited 25×
- State v. DunnSupreme Court of Iowa· 1972-06-29· cited 17×
- United States v. Maurice Malcolm DillonTenth Circuit· 1977-12-16· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.